Does Caffeine Cancel Out Creatine? 10 Studies Exposed the Truth.

Estimated read time: 3.52 minutes (about as long as it takes to read five conflicting creatine opinions on Reddit 🤔)

Hey Performance Nerds! Jonah here. 🤓

Three of you emailed me the same question this month: "Does caffeine cancel out creatine?"

Short answer: no.

A 2022 research review looked at 10 studies on this exact question. 7 out of 10 found zero interference when taken the way runners actually use them.

Here's what you'll learn today:

  • Why the 1996 study behind this myth had 9 subjects and a flawed design

  • What 10 studies actually show about taking both (7/10: no interference)

  • The exact race-day protocol for stacking creatine and caffeine

(Augie has never supplemented anything except whatever falls off my plate. His performance hasn't changed.)

🎁 I Built Something for You

Last week I gave away three half marathon plans. This week: my new free Gel Guide.

Five pages. Every major gel ranked by carb content, gut tolerance, and value. Dosing tables for every race distance. No brand paid to be on the list.

🧬 Performance Sponsors:

🧪 Science in Sport

The gel I race with (and why):

BETA FUEL: delivers 80g of carbs per serving through a 1:0.8 maltodextrin-to-fructose ratio.

That ratio is why I've never had a GI issue with it in 3 years of racing. Fast absorption, no gut bombs. I don't earn a commission on this. I negotiated 15% off for you because I believe in the science behind it.

Marathon Science subscribers get 15% off one-time purchases with code JONAH26. Live now through May 31.

🚀 Power Your Pace with Stryd

The running power meter trusted by serious athletes — is now an official performance sponsor of Marathon Science, delivering real-time pacing precision so you can train smarter and race faster.

💡 See this week’s full Stryd training tip at the end of this newsletter.

🔬 The Study That Started the Panic

One study. Nine subjects. Three decades of confusion.

Vandenberghe et al. (1996) found caffeine wiped out creatine's benefit on a leg strength test.

Runners read the headline. The myth stuck.

But look at what they actually tested:

  • 9 subjects. Too small to trust.

  • 3-week washout. Too short. Creatine needs 4+ weeks to fully clear, so leftover creatine likely skewed the results.

  • Caffeine withdrawal. Last dose was 20+ hours before testing. Withdrawal alone could tank performance.

  • Leg extensions only. Not running. Not sport-specific.

  • Chronic caffeine during loading. They dosed caffeine daily throughout the loading phase. Almost nobody supplements this way.

The protocol they tested isn't how any runner takes these supplements.

(Nine subjects. Fewer people than my last group run.)

🧬 Why the Pathways Don't Collide

Caffeine and creatine do interact at the muscle level. But it only matters at doses most runners rarely use.

Darren Candow, one of the most published creatine researchers, explains the mechanism through calcium.

Your muscles contract and relax by shuttling calcium in and out of a storage site.

Caffeine forces calcium out of storage to promote contraction. Creatine helps pump calcium back in for relaxation and recovery.

At high chronic doses, these two pull in opposite directions. A tug-of-war inside your muscle cells. That explains why Vandenberghe's protocol (5 mg/kg caffeine daily during loading) showed interference.

But timing changes everything.

A single pre-exercise caffeine dose peaks in about 60 minutes and fades fast. Creatine operates over hours. By the time creatine is doing its calcium work, caffeine's pull has faded.

Trexler & Smith-Ryan (2015) reviewed how both work in the body: direct interaction is unlikely at standard doses.

The tug-of-war is real. But at normal doses, the two aren't pulling at the same time.

(Two workers using the same machine on different shifts. No conflict.)

📊 10 Studies, One Clear Pattern

Forget one study. Here's what ten show.

Elosegui et al. (2022) reviewed all 10 studies:

7 out of 10 studies found no interference. The 2 that did used the same flawed chronic-loading protocol as Vandenberghe.

Fresh endurance data backs this up. Moesgaard et al. (2024) tested 23 endurance-trained athletes (12 men, 11 women):

  • Caffeine alone: +12W on a 6-minute time trial

  • Creatine alone: improved 15-second sprint performance

  • Combined: no interference, no synergy

Each worked through its own pathway. Neither blocked the other.

🔧 What to Actually Do on Race Day

Stop overthinking it.

⚠️ Candow's 250mg Threshold

Per Candow, caffeine above roughly 250mg can start to compete with creatine through that calcium tug-of-war. Below that, no blunting.

A typical pre-race dose for a 70kg runner at 3 mg/kg is 210mg. Well under the line.

If you're stacking pre-workout on top of morning coffee, that's where to pay attention.

For reference: I take 5g creatine with breakfast daily and 100-200mg caffeinated gels on race day.

🎯 Practical Takeaways

  • Caffeine doesn't cancel creatine. The myth comes from one underpowered 1996 study with a protocol nobody uses.

  • 7 out of 10 studies show no interference with the way runners actually supplement.

  • Take creatine daily (5g). Caffeine before races (3-6 mg/kg). Separate timing if you want to optimize: caffeine pre, creatine post.

  • Watch the 250mg caffeine threshold. Below it, no blunting. Above it, you may get muscular-level competition with creatine.

  • The only proven interference scenario: chronic high-dose caffeine during a creatine loading phase.

  • Combined use may sharpen focus under fatigue (shown in resistance-trained athletes, creatine nitrate form).

Bottom line: Take both. They compete at the cellular level only at doses and protocols most runners will never use.

Are You a True Running Nerd? Prove it.. 🧐

Welcome to the prove you’re a nerd section. Each week, I ask a question about a common running science myth.

Answer correctly, and you’ll be entered into a weekly raffle to win a package of Jonah’s favorite supplements.

If you lined up fresh and ran exactly at your second lactate threshold (LT2), what race distance would that pace most closely resemble for most trained runners?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Last Week’s Results: Blood Doping’s Real Trick 🩸🫁

EPO has been at the center of some of the biggest endurance doping scandals in sports. But the physiology behind why it works is actually pretty straightforward.

Most of you nailed this one.

The correct answer?

A. It increases red blood cell production, allowing your blood to carry more oxygen to working muscles 🩸🫁

EPO, short for erythropoietin, stimulates your bone marrow to produce more red blood cells.

More red blood cells means more hemoglobin, which means your blood can carry more oxygen to the muscles that are doing the work. For endurance athletes, oxygen delivery is often the limiting factor for aerobic performance.

That extra oxygen lets runners sustain a higher aerobic output before fatigue sets in.

Here’s how the votes shook out:

🟩 A. It increases red blood cell production, allowing your blood to carry more oxygen to working muscles 🩸🫁 – 209
⬜️ B. It boosts mitochondrial density in muscle cells, letting you produce energy more efficiently 🔋 – 5
⬜️ C. It raises lactate threshold so you can run harder before fatigue sets in ⚡ – 5
⬜️ D. It increases muscle glycogen storage so you have more fuel during long races 🍝 – 1

A few voters went with lactate threshold or mitochondria.

Those do influence endurance performance, but EPO doesn’t directly change either of them. The performance boost comes primarily from improved oxygen transport, which indirectly supports everything else your aerobic system is trying to do.

Bottom line?

EPO works because it increases your blood’s oxygen-carrying capacity, essentially giving your aerobic engine more oxygen to burn.

🚀 Stryd Training Tip: Your Threshold Doesn't Change, But How It Feels Can

I did 4x8 minutes at 345W last Weds. My Critical Power sits at 317W. That's 9% above my metabolic boundary. Spend the reserve, rest, repeat.

CP is the highest power you can hold in a metabolic steady state for a long time. Above it, fatigue accelerates. Below it, you keep going.

Caffeine lowers perceived exertion at a given power. Same 345W, less suffering. It won't instantly change your underlying fitness, and Stryd's CP reflects that. It stays stable as a pacing anchor, race to race. Won't shift mid-effort.

What caffeine can change is how much power you express on race day. Push harder above CP, tolerate more reserve before slowing.

Stryd makes this visible. Set your CP zones and watch where you race.

Why it matters:

  • Pacing anchor. CP stays stable. Won't react to caffeine, nerves, or a good night's sleep.

  • Effort vs. output. Easier above CP doesn't mean the metabolic cost dropped.

  • Environment-proof. Stryd's heat and altitude adjustments scale targets automatically.

On your next hard session, lock in a wattage near CP and notice how it feels.

Keep Reading